How To Go To Heaven: www.jesus-is-savior.com General Electric Paid No Federal Taxes in 2010 By JAKE TAPPER (@jaketapper) THE WHITE HOUSE, March 25, 2011 The top tax bracket for US corporations stands at 35 percent, one of the highest rates in the world. So how is it possible that a giant of American business, General Electric, paid nothing in federal taxes last year, even as it made billions in profit? And should the CEO of GE, Jeffrey Immelt, be advising the president on business? For two years, President Obama has been talking about the need for corporate tax reform, declaring that the system is too complicated and that companies pay too much. "Simplify, eliminate loopholes, treat everybody fairly," Obama said in February. For those unaccustomed to the loopholes and shelters of the corporate tax code, GE's success at avoiding taxes is nothing short of extraordinary. The company, led by Immelt, earned .2 billion in profits in 2010, but it paid not a penny in taxes because the bulk of those profits, some billion, were offshore. In fact, GE got a .2 billion tax benefit. LINK FOR REST www.bloggingstocks.com JPMorgan and GE Got Massive Fed Loans While Their CEOs Sat on NY Fed Board Posted Dec 6th 2010 9:30AM by Connie Madon Slowly, piece by piece, the inside details of what happened during the financial meltdown are coming to light. The latest disclosure is that JPMorgan Chase (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon and General Electric (GE) CEO Jeffrey Immelt were on the New York ...
http://leafgardenpress.com/ FASCISM BO's Job Czar Makes Jobs In China By Killing US Jobs, GE Pays No Taxes & Gets Fed Loans
ROSH HA'AYIN, Israel--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Partner Communications Company Ltd. ("Partner" or "the Company") (NASDAQ:PTNR) (TASE:PTNR), a leading Israeli mobile communications operator, announces that the Company's Board of Directors resolved to reduce the ... Partner Communications Announces That the Board of Directors Approved to ...
This refers to information sharing with other people, revealing what they would not discover or know about an individual (Borchers, 1999). There are a lot of vulnerabilities and risks that are involved in self disclosure on the individual who is willing to share out information. Self disclosure is useful in building relationships and friendships as bonds of trust and liking are generally increased.
Self disclosureSome situations warrant for self disclosure of personal information especially when people want to build an intimate relationship with a partner which will eventually lead to a commitment such as marriage (Borchers, 1999). Â Disclosing personal information is seen as a sure way of building trust and being open in such a relationship. Self disclosure is expected from both parties as this mutual sharing of information is responsible for deepening the trust within the relationship and assisting people in understanding each other better.
This norm of mutual self disclosure is known as reciprocity (Borchers, 1999).The level of self disclosure is determined by the type of relationship that an individual is engaged in. If you are in casual relationship with someone, it is least likely that you will reveal a lot of personal information about yourself and the other person will feel the same way too (Farzaneh, 2009). People who are in deep friendships will also disclose a lot of personal information, but this is least likely to happen in acquaintances. People reveal a lot of personal stuff to people they are hoping to be involved with for a long time in their lives.
Self disclosure can have a lot of effects on a personal relationship as it helps in gaining of information about the other person. This helps people in predicting the actions and thoughts of the people that they know. It is through self disclosure that one can gauge how the other person thinks and feels. If you reveal personal information to another person you are involved with in a relationship and they accept you despite the type of information you give them, this will improve your self esteem and the relationship in general (Farzaneh, 2009).
Conversely, self disclosure can be negatively used against someone as the other person may not reciprocate and share their information creating a lot of tension in a relationship. This adverse reaction from the other person will prevent the relationship from being open, since hostility from the other party prevents self disclosure from taking place in the future. Some personal information that is revealed can lead to a lot of social rejection such as; delicate information about sexual orientation and epilepsy. It is possible that an individual can reveal information to a person who is not trust worthy or one who ceases to be after a fall out. Since the other person has knowledge on an individual's characteristics that are embarrassing and failures; they can use this information in the future for belittling, manipulating and controlling the person (Farzaneh, 2009). Revealing of information is protected and guided by principle of confidentially and if one party betrays this, it is likely to contribute to a lot of mistrust and a decline in self-disclosure in the future.
ConclusionFrom the above reviews, it is clear that self disclosure can lead to building a lot of trust and openness in a relationship when reciprocated on both sides. Knowing concealed information about someone makes it easy to understand them and know how they think thus minimizing conflict. Self disclosure is determined by the type of relationship that is shared by the two people as it is likely to happen in long term relationships as opposed to short term ones. It is also clear that personal information in the wrong hands can be used in blackmailing, belittling and controlling people. Thus, people should fully trust the other individual before they decide to disclose any personal information.
Buy Custom Essays from Online Essay Writing Company.
Recommend Self disclosure ArticlesQuestion by Tropical B: Do you agree with the theory that George W. Bush is responsible for the current economic crisis? Do you agree with this: BUSH ADMINISTRATION responsible for 2008 FINANCIAL CRISIS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I see a lot of politicians and forum members pointing fingers at who was responsible for the 2008 Financial Crisis we are currently experiencing. The answer is really simple. THE BUSH ADMINSTRATION! Bush selected the Board of Governors at the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve Governors are responsible for Banking Oversight. The below quotes are found here: Federal Reserve System - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Quote: Private banks elect members of the board of directors at their regional Federal Reserve Bank while the members of the Board of Governors are selected by the President of the United States and confirmed by the Senate. Quote: The Board of Governors is the part of the Federal Reserve System that is responsible for supervising the private banks. A general description of the types of regulation and supervision involved is given by the Federal Reserve:[11] The Board also plays a major role in the supervision and regulation of the U.S. banking system. It has supervisory responsibilities for state-chartered banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System, bank holding companies (companies that control banks), the foreign activities of member banks, the U.S. activities of foreign banks, and Edge Act and agreement corporations (limited-purpose institutions that engage in a foreign banking business). The Board and, under delegated authority, the Federal Reserve Banks, supervise approximately 900 state member banks and 5,000 bank holding companies. Other federal agencies also serve as the primary federal supervisors of commercial banks; the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency supervises national banks, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation supervises state banks that are not members of the Federal Reserve System. Some regulations issued by the Board apply to the entire banking industry, whereas others apply only to member banks, that is, state banks that have chosen to join the Federal Reserve System and national banks, which by law must be members of the System. The Board also issues regulations to carry out major federal laws governing consumer credit protection, such as the Truth in Lending, Equal Credit Opportunity, and Home Mortgage Disclosure Acts. Many of these consumer protection regulations apply to various lenders outside the banking industry as well as to banks. Members of the Board of Governors are in continual contact with other policy makers in government. They frequently testify before congressional committees on the economy, monetary policy, banking supervision and regulation, consumer credit protection, financial markets, and other matters. The Board has regular contact with members of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers and other key economic officials. The Chairman also meets from time to time with the President of the United States and has regular meetings with the Secretary of the Treasury. The Chairman has formal responsibilities in the international arena as well. Quote: Preventing asset bubbles The board of directors of each Federal Reserve Bank District also have regulatory and supervisory responsibilities. For example, a member bank (private bank) is not permitted to give out too many loans to people who cannot pay them back. This is because too many defaults on loans will lead to a bank run. If the board of directors has judged that a member bank is performing or behaving poorly, it will report this to the Board of Governors. This policy is described in United States Code, Title 12, Chapter 3, subchapter 7, section 301:[23] Each Federal reserve bank shall keep itself informed of the general character and amount of the loans and investments of its member banks with a view to ascertaining whether undue use is being made of bank credit for the speculative carrying of or trading in securities, real estate, or commodities, or for any other purpose inconsistent with the maintenance of sound credit conditions; and, in determining whether to grant or refuse advances, rediscounts, or other credit accommodations, the Federal reserve bank shall give consideration to such information. The chairman of the Federal reserve bank shall report to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System any such undue use of bank credit by any member bank, together with his recommendation. Whenever, in the judgment of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, any member bank is making such undue use of bank credit, the Board may, in its discretion, after reasonable notice and an opportunity for a hearing, suspend such bank from the use of the credit facilities of the Federal Reserve System and may terminate such suspension or may renew it from time to time. To me, it looks like the oversight LAWS WERE IN PLACE, and the Federal Reserve Governo If Bush hadn't let gas prices get so out of hand we would all have $ 300-$ 500 more to spend each month to stimulate the economy. You guys are blaming Clinton? He left us with a surplus. Bush will leave us with the biggest deficit we've ever seen. Bush spent all our money and robbed us blind at the pump. Best answer for Do you agree with the theory that George W. Bush is responsible for the current economic crisis?:
Answer by Just Us
GW and all the republicans
Answer by TriPolar
nice try, but no.
Answer by susisays
Do you have any idea how long it takes an economy to end up in a mess like this financially?.......Decades! Mr. Bush is NOT responsible for this!
Answer by SAVE OUR FARMS
It's called "war economy" and he did it. The buck stops with the good ol boy, including his team
Answer by Hated
No I do not. The democratically controlled house and senate had a much bigger hand in it. You seem to think the President has a lot more power than he actually does.
Answer by daniel m
That's right. Most of it is attributable to Bush. Not Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.
Answer by John G
Everybody who has a job in washington is to blame, not just Bush.
Answer by rage_against_the_mccain9
It's not a theory, just like gravity is not a theory.
Answer by Chris R
No. Bush is greedy elitists. The Federal Reserve owns this country. Until people's USD is worth squat here soon, they won't understand. END THE FED! It's unconstitutional!
Answer by Drewdown
none of this mentions the repeal of the Glass Steagal act which directly contributed to the bundling of these mortgages as securities and was signed into law by bill clinton (although legislation was introduced by Graham/Leach...both Republicans) Bush had nothing to do with Global Crude Oil prices. The National Debt also had nothing to do with the credit crunch/mortgage crisis.
Answer by TRUE GRIT
Nice try, have you forgotten the laws Clinton made to get us into this mess in the first place!
Answer by Forest
I didnt read all those quotes, but, yes...GWB is the ass hole that messed our economy up. Spending so much $ on a war is eventually going to come back and bite you in the ass (the whole countrys ass). It makes me sad to know that our president betrayed the entire country and caused so much pain and misery for so many Americans (not just Americans). I dont know how he can even live with himself.
No comments:
Post a Comment